Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:51:45 -0800 | From | Chris Wedgwood <> | Subject | Re: Preempt & Xfs Question |
| |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:24:13PM +0000, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Well calling such a internal function (__function) is not a cleaning > coding style but works best :-) .
__foo does NOT mean it's an internal function necessarily or that it's unclean to use it (sadly Linux has pretty vague (nothing consistent) rules on how to interpret __foo versus foo really.
> Combined with the current_cpu() fixes I mentioned, it looks like > this:
(1) your patch is mangled/wrapped
(2) this is fixed in CVS already (for maybe a week or so now?)
> I'll submit it to the mailinglist as a seperate patch, so Linus can > apply it to the current Kernel.
XFS patches/suggestions should go to linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com and the maintainers there can comment as needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |