lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/29] x86-i8259-shutdown
    From
    Date
    Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> writes:

    > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:32:50PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
    > > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 02:31, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > > > From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    > > >
    > > > This patch disables interrupt generation from the legacy pic on
    > > > reboot. Now that there is a sys_device class it should not be called
    > > > while drivers are still using interrupts.
    > > >
    > > > There is a report about this breaking ACPI power off on some systems.
    > > > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
    > > > However the final comment seems to exhonorate this code. So until
    > > > I get more information I believe that was a false positive.
    > >
    > > No, the last comment in the bug report
    > > (davej says that there were poweroff problems in FC)
    > > does not exhonerate this patch.
    > > All it says is that there are additional poweroff bugs out there.
    >
    > Indeed. Since dropping the kexec bits from the Fedora kernel,
    > the 'hangs at poweroff' bug went away for a lot of folks,
    > but there still remain some people affected by some other regression.
    > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=acpi_power_off
    > has the gory details.

    Ok. I misunderstood that one then. I thought a separate fix
    had cured the bug. With the kexec bits remaining.

    Eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.042 / U:120.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site