[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: use datacs is smc91x driver
    On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Ian Campbell wrote:

    > On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:14 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
    > > Are you happy with "iocs", "attrib" and "datacs" for the names?
    > Of the platforms with an smc91x platform_device (according to grep) only
    > 2 (lubbock, neponset) out of the 18 have memory resources other than the
    > iocs (full list of platforms is at the end, after the patch)
    > So for the sake of the least intrusive patch I think for the main iocs
    > I'll call _byname and fallback on mem resource number 0 if no named iocs
    > resource exists. attrib and datacs must be explicitly named. This allows
    > most of the board ports to remain unchanged.


    > I also noticed that the name propagates into /proc/iomem etc
    > # cat /proc/iomem
    > [...]
    > 10000000-10000003 : datacs
    > 10000000-10000003 : smc91x
    > so perhaps smc91x-datacs -attrib -iocs might be more appropriate names?

    Probably, although "iocs" is rather criptic for someone not familiar
    with the chip. What about "smc91x-regs", "smc91x-attrib" and
    "smc91x-data32" ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.021 / U:180.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site