Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:49:35 -0800 | From | Grant Grundler <> | Subject | Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch |
| |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:43:30AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > I suggest read_poll(), write_poll(), spin_poll(),...
Erm...those names sound way too much like existing interfaces. Perhaps check_read_lock()/check_write_lock() ?
If they don't get used too much, the longer name should be ok.
grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |