lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives

    * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

    > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
    >
    > > I can do ppc64 myself, can others fix the other architectures (Ingo,
    > > shouldn't the UP case have the read/write_can_lock() cases too? And
    > > wouldn't you agree that it makes more sense to have the rwlock test
    > > variants in asm/rwlock.h?):
    >
    > this one adds it to x64. (untested at the moment) [...]

    with this patch the x64 SMP+PREEMPT kernel builds & boots fine on an UP
    x64 box. (this is not a full test but better than nothing.) [the other 8
    spinlock patches were all applied as well.]

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.035 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site