[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch

    > > No, that's fine, we already have to call it before entering the PM
    > > state, so I'll just pass it along and, at the low level, decide how
    > > deep to sleep based on that.
    > >
    > > I think I should also add some stats on the amount of interrupts, since
    > > it would be fairly inefficient to keep entering deep PM state on a
    > > machine with typically little timer interrupts but high HW interrupt
    > > (Rusty mentions case of packet forwarding routers or that kind of thing)
    > Maybe some HW timer interrupt mask could be used? Also it would be
    > nice to check for file IO.

    Well, you could mask those interrupts, but it would ruin your
    packet-forwarding performance, so you probably do not want to do
    People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
    ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.019 / U:7.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site