[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch

> > No, that's fine, we already have to call it before entering the PM
> > state, so I'll just pass it along and, at the low level, decide how
> > deep to sleep based on that.
> >
> > I think I should also add some stats on the amount of interrupts, since
> > it would be fairly inefficient to keep entering deep PM state on a
> > machine with typically little timer interrupts but high HW interrupt
> > (Rusty mentions case of packet forwarding routers or that kind of thing)
> Maybe some HW timer interrupt mask could be used? Also it would be
> nice to check for file IO.

Well, you could mask those interrupts, but it would ruin your
packet-forwarding performance, so you probably do not want to do
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.091 / U:54.012 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site