[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch

> Attached is the dynamic tick patch for x86 to play with
> as I promised in few threads earlier on this list.[1][2]
> The dynamic tick patch does following:
> - Separates timer interrupts from updating system time
> - Allows updating time from other interrupts in addition
> to timer interrupt
> - Makes timer tick dynamic
> - Allows power management modules to take advantage of the
> idle time inbetween skipped ticks
> - Might help with the whistling caps?
> The patch should be non-intrusive where possible. The system
> boots with the regular timers, and then later on switches on
> the dynamic tick if the selected driver implements get_hw_time()
> function.
> Currently supported timers are TSC and ACPI PM timer. Other
> timers should be easy to add. Both TSC and ACPI PM timer
> rely on the PIT timer for interrupts, so the maximum skip
> inbetween ticks is only few seconds at most.
> Please note that this patch alone does not help much with
> power savings. More work is needed in that area to make the
> system take advantage of the idle time inbetween the skipped
> ticks.

Well, having HZ=100 instead of HZ=1000 has measurable benefits on
power consumption. This should be at least as good, no?
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.169 / U:5.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site