lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cputime_t patches broke RLIMIT_CPU


On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> Yes, that's how it was done before. The patch I just posted was intended
> to fix the apparent typo without getting any deeper. Below is an untested
> alternate patch to restore the old behavior under the new macro regime.

Thanks, this one looks good. I have this nagging feeling that the test for
"every second" should be doable by using a multiply (ie do a
secs_to_cputime(secs) and see if it's smaller than "total - cputime")
rather than doing the divide that is implied by "cputime_to_secs()", but I
can't really bring myself to care, and if anything, that test for "did we
go into the next whole second" really is pretty obscure anyway.

So I can't see anything wrong with this. Anybody else? Going, going..

Linus "almost gone" Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:1.149 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site