Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:47:44 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cputime_t patches broke RLIMIT_CPU |
| |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Yes, that's how it was done before. The patch I just posted was intended > to fix the apparent typo without getting any deeper. Below is an untested > alternate patch to restore the old behavior under the new macro regime.
Thanks, this one looks good. I have this nagging feeling that the test for "every second" should be doable by using a multiply (ie do a secs_to_cputime(secs) and see if it's smaller than "total - cputime") rather than doing the divide that is implied by "cputime_to_secs()", but I can't really bring myself to care, and if anything, that test for "did we go into the next whole second" really is pretty obscure anyway.
So I can't see anything wrong with this. Anybody else? Going, going..
Linus "almost gone" Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |