Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:49:57 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] consolidate arch specific resource.h headers |
| |
* Bill Rugolsky Jr. (brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:10:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote: > > +#define INIT_RLIMITS \ > > +{ \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { _STK_LIM, _STK_LIM_MAX }, \ > > + { 0, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { 0, 0 }, \ > > + { INR_OPEN, INR_OPEN }, \ > > + { MLOCK_LIMIT, MLOCK_LIMIT }, \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \ > > + { MAX_SIGPENDING, MAX_SIGPENDING }, \ > > + { MQ_BYTES_MAX, MQ_BYTES_MAX }, \ > > +} > > While you are rooting around in there, perhaps this block > should be converted to C99 initializer syntax, to avoid > problems if arch-specific changes are later introduced?
Yes, I had considered the same. I had checked a couple arches and with proper designated initializers, that bit would not need to be duplicated.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |