[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch
* Pavel Machek <> [050119 01:44]:
> >
> > Please note that this patch alone does not help much with
> > power savings. More work is needed in that area to make the
> > system take advantage of the idle time inbetween the skipped
> > ticks.
> Well, having HZ=100 instead of HZ=1000 has measurable benefits on
> power consumption. This should be at least as good, no?

HZ=100 does not allow improving the idle loop much further
from what we have. We should be able to take advantage of the
longer idle/sleep periods inbetween the skipped ticks.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.138 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site