lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: iswraid and 2.4.x?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0800 (PST), Martins Krikis
> <mkrikis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>--- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Check your inbox from months ago ;-) AFAICS his current version
>>>addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit
>>>lkml 6
>>>months(?) ago...
>>>
>>>I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure.
>>
>>Jeff,
>>
>>As long as 2.4.30 is planned at all, I have no more
>>worries for the moment. But if so, then please don't
>>waste your time looking over the current version. In
>>about a week there should really be another one out.
>>It will add RAID10, and get rid of the "claim disks
>>for RAID" mis-feature. I'll let everybody know, of course.
>
>
> I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use
> RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels?

Intel or 'md' metadata?

You need dmraid to use the Intel proprietary format. I'm not sure if it
supports RAID10 yet, but it supports the other levels.

Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.062 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site