lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] x8664_ksyms.c: unexport register_die_notifier
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:19:28PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 11:13 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 10:26 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 08:46:49AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > The only user of register_die_notifier (kernel/kprobes.c) can't be
> > > > > built modular. Therefore, it's the EXPORT_SYMBOL is superfluous.
> > > >
> > > > Please don't apply this, it was especially intended for modular debuggers.
> > > > There is already a hacvked kdb around that uses it.
> > >
> > > eh didn't Tigran just mail lkml claiming that kdb and x86-64 really
> > > don't mix ??
> >
> > It cannot display function arguments and uses imprecise backtrace right now
> > (like normal oopses), other than that it works just fine.
>
> does it need any other kernel patches? Because if it does it might as
> well patch this export in for it's specialist use

The modular kdb needs other patches right now yes, but I would still
like to keep it for other debuggers. Previously we always had tons of
ugly patchkit comming with every debugging add on and the exception
notifiers were exactly designed to provide a clean interface for
everybody for this. I definitely don't want to go back to the old
"own patch for everbody" mess again on x86-64.

-Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.034 / U:0.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site