Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:55:04 -0800 | From | Chris Wedgwood <> | Subject | Re: patch to fix set_itimer() behaviour in boundary cases |
| |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I don't see a valid reason to restrict/reject input that is accepted > now and dealt with reasonably because some standard says so (if you > design a new api, following the standard is nice of course). I don't > see "doesn't reject a condition that can reasonable be dealt with" > as a good reason to go double ABI at all.
we could printk for now and if nobody reports this to lkml (as they do/did with oldish tcpdump/libpcap a while ago) we could -EINVAL
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |