[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
Paul Davis wrote:
>>>Paul. Everyone agrees with you. I think. We just need to work out
>>>the best way of doing it.
>>>Would I be right in suspecting that we know what to do, but nobody has
>>>stepped up to write the code? It's kinda looking like that?
>>I thought I made it clear i had already volunteered. I was after a
>>response to my proposal for how to do it.
> I think your proposal is a good (maybe even excellent) one, but it
> somewhat sidesteps the issue (which may be the best thing to
> do). Rather than answering the question "how best to allow regular
> users access to SCHED_FIFO", it says "lets offer regular users
> SCHED_ISO which is essentially identical to SCHED_FIFO unless tasks
> running SCHED_ISO use too much cpu time".
> its a fine answer, but its the answer to a slightly different
> question. if anyone (maybe us audio freaks, maybe someone else) comes
> up with a reason to want "The Real SCHED_FIFO", the original question
> will have gone unanswered.

Ah then you missed something. You can set the max cpu of SCHED_ISO to
100% and then you have it.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.173 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site