lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: page table lock patch V15 [0/7]: overview
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:42:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Changes from V14->V15 of this patch:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder what everyone thinks about moving forward with these patches?
>
> I was waiting for them to settle down before paying more attention.
>
> My general take is that these patches address a single workload on
> exceedingly rare and expensive machines. If they adversely affect common
> and cheap machines via code complexity, memory footprint or via runtime
> impact then it would be pretty hard to justify their inclusion.
>
> Do we have measurements of the negative and/or positive impact on smaller
> machines?

I haven't seen wide performance numbers of this patch yet.

Hint: STP is really easy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.206 / U:3.712 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site