[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    * Matt Mackall ( wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:42:51PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
    > > > But I'm also still not convinced this policy can't be most flexibly
    > > > handled by a setuid helper together with the mlock rlimit.
    > >
    > > Wait, why can't it be done with (to date fictitious) pam_prio, which
    > > simply calls sched_setscheduler? It's already privileged while it's
    > > doing these things...
    > You certainly do not want to run everything at RT from login on.
    > That'd be bad.

    Yup, true.

    > Also, tying to UIDs rather than (UID, executable) is worrisome as
    > random_game_with_audio in Gnome might decide it needs RT, much to the
    > admin's surprise.

    Hmm, well, the pam_limit approach has that problem.

    Linux Security Modules
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.024 / U:1.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site