lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    * Matt Mackall (mpm@selenic.com) wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:42:51PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
    > > > But I'm also still not convinced this policy can't be most flexibly
    > > > handled by a setuid helper together with the mlock rlimit.
    > >
    > > Wait, why can't it be done with (to date fictitious) pam_prio, which
    > > simply calls sched_setscheduler? It's already privileged while it's
    > > doing these things...
    >
    > You certainly do not want to run everything at RT from login on.
    > That'd be bad.

    Yup, true.

    > Also, tying to UIDs rather than (UID, executable) is worrisome as
    > random_game_with_audio in Gnome might decide it needs RT, much to the
    > admin's surprise.

    Hmm, well, the pam_limit approach has that problem.

    thanks,
    -chris
    --
    Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.023 / U:29.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site