[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:42:51PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
    > > But I'm also still not convinced this policy can't be most flexibly
    > > handled by a setuid helper together with the mlock rlimit.
    > Wait, why can't it be done with (to date fictitious) pam_prio, which
    > simply calls sched_setscheduler? It's already privileged while it's
    > doing these things...

    You certainly do not want to run everything at RT from login on.
    That'd be bad.

    Also, tying to UIDs rather than (UID, executable) is worrisome as
    random_game_with_audio in Gnome might decide it needs RT, much to the
    admin's surprise.

    Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.329 / U:40.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site