lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
* Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:05 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Anyway, *plonk*.
>
> Plonk? WTF? Jack comes up with what many people think is a reasonable
> solution to a real problem, that affects thousands of users, and in the
> middle of what seems to me a civilized discussion, you killfile him
> because he disagrees with you?
>
> Plonk to you too, asshole.

Guys, could we please bring this back to a useful discussion. None of
you have commented on whether the rlimits for priority are useful. As I
said before, I've no real problem with the module as it stands since it's
tiny, quite contained, and does something people need. But I agree it'd
be better to find something that's workable as long term solution.

thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.116 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site