Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:47:07 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM |
| |
* Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:05 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote: > > Anyway, *plonk*. > > Plonk? WTF? Jack comes up with what many people think is a reasonable > solution to a real problem, that affects thousands of users, and in the > middle of what seems to me a civilized discussion, you killfile him > because he disagrees with you? > > Plonk to you too, asshole.
Guys, could we please bring this back to a useful discussion. None of you have commented on whether the rlimits for priority are useful. As I said before, I've no real problem with the module as it stands since it's tiny, quite contained, and does something people need. But I agree it'd be better to find something that's workable as long term solution.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |