[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Chris Wright wrote:

> * Jesper Juhl ( wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Steve Bergman wrote:
> > > Actually I am having a discussion with a Pax Team member about how the recent
> > > exploits discovered by the grsecurity guys should have been handled. They
> > > clam that they sent email to Linus and Andrew and did not receive a response
> > > for 3 weeks, and that is why they released exploit code into the wild.
> > >
> > > Anyone here have any comments on what I should tell him?
> > >
> > I don't know what other people would do or what the general feeling on
> > the list is, but personally I'd send such reports to the maintainer and
> > CC lkml, if there is no maintainer I'd just send to lkml.
> Problem is, the rest of the world uses a security contact for reporting
> security sensitive bugs to project maintainers and coordinating
> disclosures. I think it would be good for the kernel to do that as well.
Problem is that the info can then get stuck at a vendor or maintainer
outside of public view and risk being mothballed. It also limits the
number of people who can work on a solution (including peole getting to
work on auditing other code for similar issues). It also prevents admins
from taking alternative precautions prior to availability of a fix (you
have to assume the bad guys already know of the bug, not just the good

Jesper Juhl

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:1.722 / U:6.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site