lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64
William Lee Irwin III writes:

> Checking in_lock_functions() (not sure what the name in Zwane's code
> was) for non-leaf functions in get_wchan() in addition to
> in_sched_functions() should do. e.g.

Well, no, not if we are two levels deep at this point (i.e. something
calls _spin_lock which calls __preempt_spin_lock). I really don't
want to have to start doing a stack trace in profile_pc().

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.079 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site