Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v.A0) | From | john stultz <> | Date | Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:07:25 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:02, George Anzinger wrote: > > Again, monotonic_clock() and friends are NTP adjusted, so drift caused > > by inaccurate calibration shouldn't be a problem the interval timer code > > should need to worry about (outside of maybe adjusting its interval time > > if its always arriving late/early). If possible the timesource > > calibration code should be improved, but that's icing on the cake and > > isn't critical. > > > Are you providing a way to predict what clock count provide a given time offset > INCLUDING ntp? If so, cool. If not we need to get this conversion right. We > will go into this more on your return.
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Mind expanding on the idea while my brain warms back up?
thanks -john
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |