lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v.A0)
From
Date
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:02, George Anzinger wrote:
> > Again, monotonic_clock() and friends are NTP adjusted, so drift caused
> > by inaccurate calibration shouldn't be a problem the interval timer code
> > should need to worry about (outside of maybe adjusting its interval time
> > if its always arriving late/early). If possible the timesource
> > calibration code should be improved, but that's icing on the cake and
> > isn't critical.
> >
> Are you providing a way to predict what clock count provide a given time offset
> INCLUDING ntp? If so, cool. If not we need to get this conversion right. We
> will go into this more on your return.

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Mind expanding on the idea while my
brain warms back up?

thanks
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.217 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site