Messages in this thread | | | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: Scheduler experiences (with Reiser4 bug report) | Date | Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:53:50 -0400 |
| |
Markus Törnqvist wrote: > Yours truly wrote: > >>I haven't tried nicksched in a while, but it didn't perform as well as >>Staircase. > > > Just gave -rc1-mm3 a shot and had my filesystems say bad things. > shrike kernel: reiser4 panicked cowardly: assertion failed: extent_get_start(ext) == extent_get_start(&uf_coord->extension.extent.extent) > /bin/sh: line 1: 4407 Segmentation fault rm -f fs/xfs/.xfs_bmap.o.d > > > Didn't get around to renicing X, but anyway, app launch time was longer > and the music did twitch a bit when starting the simultaneous kernel > and glibc compiles. So I'm still on Staircase and don't see any reason > to change away. > > I retried running as much cpu-intensive stuff as I could on cko5, basically > ck6, and everything was smooth. Respects to Con for that :) > > This is not a troll nor a flamebait, but an honest question. > Should the need to re-nice X not be seen as broken behavior?
It would be desirable to have things run without doing that, people will undoubtedly call it a bug or tuning, depending on point of view.
-- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |