Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:09:32 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 15:47, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:34:03AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > Hmm, whenever i've brought up weak functions in a patch it's never well > > > received. Frankly i prefer it to littering the architectures with similar > > > functions. > > > > That's what we have asm-generic for. > > So you have an inline function in a header and include it everywhere? How > is that better?
the thing is, now with the config option, you don't need the generic_ wrapper thing, just use the full real name. And the prototypes can be generic for the arch's that want it.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |