Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:36:16 +0300 | From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> | Subject | Is FIOQSIZE compatible? ( was Re: f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel) |
| |
Hello! Quoting r. Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) "Re: [discuss] f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel": > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > but I cannot think of a good alternative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe one entry point with a flag? > > > > > > That would be IMHO far uglier than two. > > > > > > -Andi > > > > > > > What would be a good name? ioctl32/ioctl64? ioctl_compat/ioctl_native? > > Later two sound ok to me. > > -Andi
Why is FIOQSIZE in arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32_ioctl.c and not in include/linux/compat_ioctl.h ?
It is as far as I can see returning simply loff_t which is 64 bit on all architectures.
Thanks, MST - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |