Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:44:53 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [discuss] f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel |
| |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:37:02PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hello! > Quoting r. Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) "Re: [discuss] f_ops flag to speed up compatible ioctls in linux kernel": > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:25:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > It may help your module, but won't solve the general problem shorter > > > > term. > > > But longer term it will be better, so why not go there? > > > Once the infrastructure is there, drivers will be able to be > > > migrated as required. > > > > I have no problems with that. You would need two new entry points: > > one 64bit one without BKL and a 32bit one also without BKL. > > > > I think there were some objections to this scheme in the past, > > but I cannot think of a good alternative. > > > > Maybe one entry point with a flag?
That would be IMHO far uglier than two.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |