[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
    On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 02:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:

    > But transports are important, I agree.

    Oh, I have another thought (see my previous email first).

    The proper course of action based on your suggestion is to cleanly
    abstract the concept of the "backend transport" from the notifier, and
    offer a compile-time option of hotplug, netlink, and/or whatever else.
    Make the transport pluggable and configurable. Do it cleanly. Yada

    But that is a lot of code and a lot of work. More than I think is
    warranted, right?

    Accepting that the above is the clean and proper way to do what you say,
    let's carry it through. What is the ideal situation? People pick
    either hotplug or netlink or foo as their transport. Why pick more than
    one? Most people select hotplug because that is there now and works.
    Maybe in the future people would choose netlink and move to that. This
    is all ideally.

    In practice, however, we get people enabling both hotplug and netlink,
    because they need hotplug for hotplug and want netlink for the new
    kevent stuff. So this approach leads to no one ever picking the ideal.

    What we want is people using hotplug for hotplug, and kevent over
    netlink for the event stuff.

    So why stick the two together?

    We have kobject_hotplug() and kobject_notify() and everything makes

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.019 / U:95.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site