lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:45:13PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Horst von Brand wrote:
    > > What happened to "code talks, bullshit walks"?
    >
    > devfs is a fine example of why code isn't enough. With devfs the code
    > came first, the >1 year of strategic bullshit politics from the "it's
    > not traditional unix" crowd came later, then it went in, then lots of
    > people used it, then it was replaced by something which still doesn't
    > work as well as 2.4 does with or without devfs, and people are still
    > using it despite it's faults.

    What is udev's faults that have an issue with?

    Yes, we don't do module autoloading when opening a device node, but
    that's well known, documented, and the way the kernel has evolved to
    anyway.

    thanks,

    greg k-h
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.021 / U:61.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site