lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 13:02, K.R. Foley wrote:
    > OK. I previously reported about the system hanging trying to boot this
    > patch. It may have been a fluke. In any event, it doesn't hang
    > consistently. I have rebooted several times now without problems. I do
    > however still get some of these:
    >
    > (ksoftirqd/0/2): new 131 us maximum-latency critical section.
    > => started at: <netif_receive_skb+0x82/0x280>
    > => ended at: <netif_receive_skb+0x1d7/0x280>

    This is actually a good sign if this is the most common one you see.
    The netif_receive softirq is basically the longest code path that can't
    easily be made preemptible; on my hardware about 150 usecs seems to be
    the best we can do. This is really good, I can't imagine an application
    that you would use PC hardware for where 150 usecs is not enough, though
    I am sure the hard realtime crowd has a few.

    Even fixing this one would not help much because it seems there are many
    other non-preemtible code paths that are only a little shorter than this
    one.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.034 / U:30.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site