[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ACPI] [PATCH] Updated patches for PCI IRQ resource deallocation support [2/3]
    Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
    > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
    >> > > Why not just make these static inlines in header files? Since you're on
    >> > > this, how about making irq_desc and friends dynamic too?
    >> I'm not quite sure what you are saying, but my idea is defining
    >> acpi_unregister_gsi() as a opposite part of acpi_register_gsi().
    >> Acpi_register_gsi() is defined for each arch (i386, ia64), so
    >> acpi_unregister_gsi() is defined for each i386 and ia64 too.
    > Well i meant can't you define them in a header file as follows;
    > static void inline acpi_unregister_gsi (unsigned int irq)
    > {
    > }
    > An advantage is that it saves memory since you don't also have to create
    > the extra data objects for the exported symbol. But really you don't have
    > to export something which does nothing.
    Hi Zwane,

    I understand what you mean. It looks good to me.
    I'll update my patch.

    Kenji Kaneshige

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.023 / U:5.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site