[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ACPI] [PATCH] Updated patches for PCI IRQ resource deallocation support [2/3]
Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> > > Why not just make these static inlines in header files? Since you're on
>> > > this, how about making irq_desc and friends dynamic too?
>> I'm not quite sure what you are saying, but my idea is defining
>> acpi_unregister_gsi() as a opposite part of acpi_register_gsi().
>> Acpi_register_gsi() is defined for each arch (i386, ia64), so
>> acpi_unregister_gsi() is defined for each i386 and ia64 too.
> Well i meant can't you define them in a header file as follows;
> static void inline acpi_unregister_gsi (unsigned int irq)
> {
> }
> An advantage is that it saves memory since you don't also have to create
> the extra data objects for the exported symbol. But really you don't have
> to export something which does nothing.
Hi Zwane,

I understand what you mean. It looks good to me.
I'll update my patch.

Kenji Kaneshige

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.060 / U:7.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site