[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Why don't you pass a file descriptor into the syscall instead of a pathname?
> > You can then take a ref on the inode and userspace can close the file.
> > That gets you permission checking for free.
> For passing in the data, that would work. Wouldn't you still need a name or
> path when getting data back though?

Does Andrew mean an fd on the thing being watched?

That is what we are trying to fix with dnotify: the open fd's are pin
the device and prevent unmount, making notification on removable devices
impossible. Such a 1:1 relationship also opens way too many fd's.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.144 / U:2.964 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site