[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:12:26PM +0100, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just out of interest then...suppose we've got a loopback swap device
> and that we can extend this by creating a new file or extending
> somehow the existing one.
> What would be wrong with having the page reclaim algorithms use one of
> the low memory watermarks as a trigger to call in to userspace to
> extend the swap available if possible? This is probably what Microsoft
> et al do with their "Windows is extending your virtual memory, yada
> yada blah blah". Comments? Already done?

You dont to change kernel code for that - make a script to monitor
swap usage, as soon as it gets below a given watermark, you swapon
whatever swapfile you want.

Makes sense yes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.070 / U:7.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site