[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC] Simplified Readahead
Ray Bryant wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> On question I have (and I'm sorry, I haven't had time to look at your
> patch to sort this out) is what happens if the user supplies a rather
> serious I/O size, will you read ahead multiples of that, or what
> happens? Or, for that matter, how well will it perform?

Same behavior as the old code. I/Os are broken up into at most
max_readahead size pieces. In the case of the old code only 1 of these
could be outstanding. In the new code there could be at most 2
outstanding at any point in time.

> I've heard about HPC applications for IRIX that issue a 2GB read. :-)

This is why for these types of applications, especially on RAID arrays,
you need to set max_readahead into the MBs. (But that is a different topic).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.219 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site