[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.6] smbfs & "du" illness
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Because right now the number is meaningless, and the Linux client is
> apparently better off ignoring it totally.

Actually, just to be clear - the number isn't completely
meaningless, it's the actual size on disk (from the st_blocks
if they're available, filesize if not) rounded up to the nearest
1mb boundary. Just didn't want you to think we were randomly
returning 1mb. It's a meaningful number, it's just the granularity
that's a bit off :-).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.072 / U:23.416 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site