[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.6] smbfs & "du" illness
    On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Because right now the number is meaningless, and the Linux client is
    > apparently better off ignoring it totally.

    Actually, just to be clear - the number isn't completely
    meaningless, it's the actual size on disk (from the st_blocks
    if they're available, filesize if not) rounded up to the nearest
    1mb boundary. Just didn't want you to think we were randomly
    returning 1mb. It's a meaningful number, it's just the granularity
    that's a bit off :-).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.018 / U:1.536 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site