[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 18:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <> wrote:
> > > i've given up on the netdev_backlog_granularity approach, and as a
> > > replacement i've modified specific network drivers to return at a safe
> > > point if softirq preemption is requested.
> >
> > Makes sense, netdev_max_backlog never made a difference on my system
> > (via-rhine driver).
> via-rhine does RX processing from the hardirq handler, this codepath is
> harder to break up. The NAPI ->poll functions used by e100 and 8193too
> are much easier to break up because RX throttling and re-trying is a
> basic property of NAPI.

What I meant was, I did not consider the latencies from via-rhine to be
a problem. The other posters reported 300-500 usec latencies in the
network driver, I did not see this.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.262 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site