lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] tune vmalloc size
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:03:40PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > that is the case already
>
> why do we still use 128MB as a default then? this is way over-kill
> from what i can tell looking on what my machines use. i'd rather have
> this be a bit smaller and enable the slab/whatever to grow a little
> more

if you have an old glibc it will use ldt's which in turn use vmalloc for
threading... 128Mb is no luxury there.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.756 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site