lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 01:56:43PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:49:18PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 13:47 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> >
> > > Are you not sending it with some specific device as the source? Or is it
> > > just coming from some abstract root kobject?
> >
> > It comes the the physical device.
> >
> > Is there really a specific issue that you are seeing?
>
> Well, two.
>
> 1) If you send me an event "/dev/hda3 mounted", but it was for some other
> namespace, you just leaked potentially useful information.

You can listen only as root!
All information is already in /proc/mounts.

> I'm no security expert, but that seems to me to be a gratuitous leak.

I don't aggree on the second part :)

> Maybe it's just another example of why namespaces need to go away.
>
> 2) If you send me an event "/dev/hda3 mounted" do I also get an event when
> I loopback mount /tmp/rh9.0-1.iso or when I bind mount /foo to /bar or
> when I mount server:/export/home on /home?

You get an event if fs-code claims/relases a genhd. It's a claim/release
event to be more precise. Only the first mount will emit a event and the
last umount.


thaks,
Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:1.311 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site