Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:59:46 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 22:36, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > I have neither of these locally. I suspect someone needs to care enough > about the code for anything to happen soon. I suppose there are things > that probably weren't tried, e.g. auditing to make sure dependencies on > external synchronization are taken care of, removing implicit sleeping > with the BKL held, then punt a private recursive spinlock in reiser3's > direction. Not sure what went on, or if I want to get involved in this > particular case. >
There isn't really any information in the archives about what was tried. Here's Andrew's message:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/7/12/266
And Hans':
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/10/320
I suspect that "Use reiser4 (or ext3) if you care about latency" is a good enough answer for most people.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |