Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:19:27 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 17:07 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I don't know, the firmware objects already use "add" for an event. I > didn't put a check in the kobject_uevent() calls to prevent the add and > remove, but now it's a lot easier to do so if you think it's necessary.
I have no problem with this, either, so long as we are not too anal or strict about adding new actions.
In other words, I like the safety and typo prevention that this gives us, but want to keep things flexible and easy.
Best,
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |