lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.9-rc1-mm5
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Please replace patch next_thread-bug-fixes.patch in -mm5 tree with the
> last diff-next_thread I sent to you.

I was planning on replacing it with Ingo's patch.

--- linux/fs/proc/array.c.orig
+++ linux/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru
stime = task->signal->stime;
}
}
- if (whole) {
+ if (whole && task->sighand) {

Is there some reason why your patch is better? If so, please do a full
resend.

> And it looks like thread loop in do_task_stat() doesn't require siglock
> lock, so you can add the patch attached to reduce lock area.

hm, OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans