Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:42:01 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [Patch 4/4] cpusets top mask just online, not all possible |
| |
pj wrote: > I expect that disabling a Memory Node should result in some > "move_task_off_dead_memory()" routine, ... > Does this expectation fit for you?
Dave replied: > That seems pretty reasonable to me. ...
In other words, as is apparent in the reply I just sent a few minutes ago, what I wrote about "move_task_off_dead_memory()" routine no longer seems at all reasonable to me ;).
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |