lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: `new' syscalls for m68k
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP?
> Not really
>
> > - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are
> > missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other
> > method for Thread Local Storage?
>
> Up to your implementation
>
> > - What about sys_vserver()?

I would be happy to add a syscall reservation
to the list of already reserved syscalls for
i386, x86_64, s390, sparc/64, sh3/4, ppc/64
and mips * ...

> Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other
> security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one
> assumes would do likewise)

sorry, SELinux and friends can and do not even
remotely implement the same functionality, and
linux-vserver for 2.6 is working fine ...

best,
Herbert

> > - What about sys_kexec_load()?
>
> Depends if you support kexec
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.296 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site