[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [pagevec] resize pagevec to O(lg(NR_CPUS))
William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> It's unclear what you're estimating the size of. PAGEVEC_SIZE of 62

Overhead of the loaded pagevec.


> mapping->tree_lock is affected as well as zone->lru_lock. The workload
> obviously has to touch the relevant locks for pagevecs to be relevant;
> however, the primary factor in the effectiveness of pagevecs is the
> lock transfer time, which is not likely to vary significantly on boxen
> such as the OSDL STP machines. You should use a workload stressing
> mapping->tree_lock via codepaths using radix_tree_gang_lookup() and
> getting runtime on OSDL's NUMA-Q or otherwise asking SGI to test its
> effects, otherwise you're dorking around with boxen with identical
> characteristics as far as batched locking is concerned.

Yeah I forgot about that. I guess it probably would be easier to
get contention on the tree lock.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.044 / U:9.152 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site