Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:39:23 +0200 | From | Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz <> | Subject | Re: Major XFS problems... |
| |
Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
><frustrated_admin mode="on"> > >Does anyone actually use XFS for serious file-serving? (yes, I run it >on my desktop at home and I don't have problems there - such reports are >not really relevant). > >Is anyone actually maintaining/bugfixing XFS? Yes, I know the >MAINTAINERS file, but I am a little bit confused here - seeing that >trivial-to-trigger bugs that crash the system and have simple fixes, >have not been fixed in current mainline kernels. > >If XFS is a no-go because of lack of support, is there any realistic >alternatives under Linux (taking our need for quota into account) ? > >And finally, if Linux is simply a no-go for high performance file >serving, what other suggestions might people have? NetApp? > ></> > > > In my expierence XFS, was right after JFS the worst and the slowest filesystem ever made. Since than, I am using reiserfs 3.6. I don't need quota for my servers, but there is patch avaliable for it I belive, from SuSE. ReiserFS is da most reliable FS for linux (with journaling). If you don't need journaling, ext2 is da choice.
-- GJ
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |