Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:07 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [patch] kernel events layer |
| |
Hi!
> > Should there be some sharing with the device naming of sysfs or are > > will we introduce a new one? ie sysfs uses: > > > > devices/system/cpu/cpu0/<blah> > > > > Would it be a better way to have a version that takes struct kobject > > to enforce consistency in the device naming scheme. This also means > > userspace would automatically know where to look in /sys if futher > > info was needed. > > No, we want to give an interface that matches the sort of provider URI > used by object systems such as CORBA, D-BUS, and DCOP. We also do _not_ > want to put policy in the kernel.
Funny... you want to create new namespace and argue "no policy".
If you want to translate it to something URI-like, you should do that in userspace.
-- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |