[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: dynamic /dev security hole?
    On 08 Aug 2004 08:47:40 -0400
    Albert Cahalan <> wrote:

    > Suppose I have access to a device, for whatever legit
    > reason. Maybe I'm given access to a USB key with
    > some particular serial number.
    > I hard link this to somewhere else. Never mind that an
    > admin could in theory use 42 separate partitions and
    > mount most of the system with the "nodev" option. This
    > is rarely done.
    > Now the device is removed. The /dev entry goes away.
    > A new device is added, and it gets the same device
    > number as the device I had legit access to. Hmmm?

    This would require (1) /dev to be inside the root filesystem and (2) users
    having write access somewhere in that filesystem.

    (1) is uncommon, often a separate filesystem is used for udev
    (2) is very bad practice anyway and should never be seen on a true
    multi-user machine

    Besides, this is nothing new. Dynamic permission updates through PAM have
    the same issue, and anyone calling themselves "admin" should be well aware
    of those issues. This is basic Unix-security, after all.

    Yet, this issue should probably mentioned in documentation. It certainly
    should be mentioned in the udev-HOWTO.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.021 / U:5.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site