lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: secure computing for 2.6.7
Stephen Smalley wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:27, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>Am I right to think that this could complement nicely our plans
>>described at www.namesys.com/blackbox_security.html
>>
>>
>
>Hi Hans,
>
>Out of curiosity, what do you think that this proposal will achieve that
>cannot already be done via SELinux policy? SELinux policy can already
>express access rules based not only on the executable and user, but even
>the entire call chain that led to a given executable.
>
>
>
Where do you store the access rules? With the executable? How do you
automate their determination?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.172 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site