Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:35:08 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
> There's no relation to PAGG but I think cpusets and CKRM should be > made to come together. One of CKRM's user interfaces is a filesystem > with the file-tree representing the class hierarchy. It's the same for > cpusets.
OK, that makes sense ...
> I'd vote for cpusets going in soon. CKRM could be extended by > a cpusets controller which should be pretty trivial when using the > infrastructure of this patch. It simply needs to create classes > (cpusets) and attach processes to them. The enforcement of resources > happens automatically. When CKRM is mature to enter the kernel, one > could drop /dev/cpusets in favor of the CKRM way of doing it.
But I think that's dangerous. It's very hard to get rid of existing user interfaces ... I'd much rather we sorted out what we're doing BEFORE putting either in the kernel.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |