lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] FUSYN Realtime & robust mutexes for Linux, v2.3.1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> But doesn't the current futex code continue to work unchanged?

If the patches don't touch the existing futex code there is no risk of
breaking anything. Futexes and these new objects have nothing to do
with each other.


> I was referring to "scheduling-policy based unlock/wakeup", actually.

We don't have anything like this for futexes. It's not impossible to
do, we just didn't do it because it was of not much interest to us at
that time.

--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.717 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site