[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Solving suspend-level confusion
On Thursday 05 August 2004 03:19, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> That's what my patch does. I kept the existing api untouched so that:
> device_resume();
> is actually a wrapper for
> device_resume_tree(&default_device_tree);
> Proof of the pudding coming :>

Sounds good. Will it be possible to remove devices during
these tree operations? Probably never the current one.

And (evil chuckle) how will it behave if two tasks are doing
that concurrently? The no-overlap case would be fully
parallel, I'd hope!

- Dave
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.061 / U:10.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site