Messages in this thread | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: Solving suspend-level confusion | Date | Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:32:04 -0700 |
| |
On Thursday 05 August 2004 03:19, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> That's what my patch does. I kept the existing api untouched so that: > > device_resume(); > > is actually a wrapper for > > device_resume_tree(&default_device_tree); > > Proof of the pudding coming :>
Sounds good. Will it be possible to remove devices during these tree operations? Probably never the current one.
And (evil chuckle) how will it behave if two tasks are doing that concurrently? The no-overlap case would be fully parallel, I'd hope!
- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |