[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Solving suspend-level confusion
    On Thursday 05 August 2004 03:19, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

    > That's what my patch does. I kept the existing api untouched so that:
    > device_resume();
    > is actually a wrapper for
    > device_resume_tree(&default_device_tree);
    > Proof of the pudding coming :>

    Sounds good. Will it be possible to remove devices during
    these tree operations? Probably never the current one.

    And (evil chuckle) how will it behave if two tasks are doing
    that concurrently? The no-overlap case would be fully
    parallel, I'd hope!

    - Dave
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:20.948 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site