Messages in this thread | | | Subject | SCHED_BATCH and SCHED_BATCH numbering | From | Albert Cahalan <> | Date | 04 Aug 2004 12:50:28 -0400 |
| |
Are these going to be numbered consecutively, or might they better be done like the task state? SCHED_FIFO is in fact already treated this way in one place. One might want to test values this way:
if(foo & (SCHED_ISO|SCHED_RR|SCHED_FIFO)) ...
(leaving aside SCHED_OTHER==0, or just translate that single value for the ABI)
I'd like to see these get permenant allocations soon, even if the code doesn't go into the kernel. This is because user-space needs to know the values.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |